Volume 3, Issue 4, August 2015, Page: 26-31
Factors Influencing Girl’s Performance in Physics in National Schools in Kiambu and Nairobi Counties of Kenya
J. Akweya, Department of Educational Communication Technology, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya
N. Twoli, Department of Educational Communication Technology, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya
G. Waweru, Department of Educational Communication Technology, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya
Received: Jul. 2, 2014;       Accepted: Jul. 28, 2014;       Published: Jun. 16, 2015
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20150304.11      View  8319      Downloads  224
Abstract
This study was designed to investigate factors that influence girls’ enrolment and performance in physics in five (28%) traditional national schools in Kenya. Meaningful learning of physics is the hallmark of a technologically competent workforce in science, technology and engineering. However, there is a lower performance index and enrolment of girls opting to study physics at Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE). Specifically, the factors of attitudes of students, learners’ ability and teacher characteristics were found to affect enrolment and performance of girls in physics. Three theories that influence the understanding of the issues in this study include Bloom’s Theory of Affect, Bruner’s Theory of Constructivism and Kneller’s Progressive Theory. Despite intervention measures by the Ministry of Education to alleviate girls’ polarization in enrolment and performance in physics, the Ministry of Education Science and Technology (MOEST), 2006 module report upholds that there are negative influences in the teaching and learning of science. A wide range of literature review on girls’ enrolment and performance in physics nationally and in sub county schools showed low enrolment and poor performance at KCSE. However, no research was evident on factors that influence girls’ performance in physics in Kenya national schools. The study used a survey design among five national schools in Nairobi and Kiambu counties; form two class was chosen as the target population as well as teachers of science and mathematics in the five schools. Purposive and simple random sampling was used in the study. A random sample of two hundred and twenty eight form two students was selected from the five schools. From each school a sample of forty five students was selected using a simple random sampling method. Questionnaires were used to collect data for both teacher and student factors. In addition, an Achievement Test was used to isolate areas of misconceptions that account for poor performance of girls compared to boys. The data was analysed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was used in data analysis. Means, frequency distributions and percentages, histograms, and pie charts were determined. Likert Scale was used to measure attitudes affecting performance of physics among all the targeted girls’ schools and the teachers. The study showed students’ attitude, learner’s ability and teacher characteristics, affected girls’ enrolment and performance in physics in national schools. The girls had better positive attitudes and performance in learner abilities in physics than the boys. The results also showed that teachers of physics in girls’ national schools are effective and efficient in instructional designs. The findings of this study may be used to foster positive attitudes towards physics. The methods of physics instruction among girls may also be impacted by constructivism approaches as the results show strong preference to physics practical work.
Keywords
Secondary Education, Girl Child Performance, Physics, Science Education
To cite this article
J. Akweya, N. Twoli, G. Waweru, Factors Influencing Girl’s Performance in Physics in National Schools in Kiambu and Nairobi Counties of Kenya, International Journal of Secondary Education. Vol. 3, No. 4, 2015, pp. 26-31. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20150304.11
Reference
[1]
Alters, B. J. (1995) Counseling Physics Students: A Research Basis. The Physics Teacher, 33, Pp.413- 415.
[2]
Bell, J. (1987). Doing Your Research Project. A Guide for First-Time Research in Education and Social Science, Milton Keynes, U.S.A, Philadelphia Open University Press.
[3]
Bennett, J. (2003). Teaching and Learning Science. London, U.K. Continuum.
[4]
Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York, U.S.A, David McKay Co Inc.
[5]
Bock, R.D. and Kolakowski, D. (1973). ‘Further evidence of sex-linked major gene influence on human spatial visualizing ability’. American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 25, pp. 1-14.
[6]
Brinkmann, E. (1966) Programmed Instruction as a Technique for Improving Spatial Visualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50, pp 179-184.
[7]
Britner, S.L. and Pajares, F. (2001) Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7, pp. 271-285
[8]
Broverman, D.M., Klaiber, E.L., Kobayashi, Y.  Vogel, W. (1968). ‘Roles of activation and inhibition in sex differences in cognitive abilities’. Psychological Review, vol. 75, pp 25-30.
[9]
Burton, L. (2007). Concepts, Hypotheses, and Theoretical Frameworks. John Hopkins University. www.ocw.jhsph.edu/hsre/PDFs/HSRE.lect3- burton pdf.
[10]
Cherry, G. (2004). An Overview of Jerome Brunner His Theory of Constructivism. In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for ECI 761. Richard Overbaugh. March 18th.
[11]
Chiriswa, P. (2002).An Investigation into the Probable Factors Responsible for Poor Performance in Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE) In Vihiga District Of Western Province, Kenya. Unpublished MEd Thesis. Kenyatta University. Kenya
[12]
Comber, L.C. and Keeves, J.P. (1973). Science Education in Nineteen Countries. An Empirical Study. New York, U.S.A, A Halsted Press Book.
[13]
Constructivism Theory. (2004). http://tip.psychology.org/ bruner.html
[14]
Crawley, F.E. and Black, C. (1992). ‘Causal Modeling of Secondary Science Students’ Intentions to Enroll in Physics’. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 29 (6) pp. 585-599.
[15]
Dainton (1968). Dainton report HC Deb 14 March, 1968. Vol. 760 cc1601 – 2
[16]
Danielson, C. (2007) Enhancing professional practice. A framework for taeaching. 2nd edition. Aleaxandaria, VA. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
[17]
Delialioglu, O. and Askar, P. (1999). Contribution of Students’ Mathematical Skills and Spatial Ability to Achievement in Secondary Schools Physics. Journal of Education.16-17: pp.34 -39
[18]
Duckworth, D. and Ormerod, M.B. (1975). Pupils’ Attitude to Science. New Jersey, U.S.A. Humanities Press Atlantic Highlands.
[19]
Efumbi, M.D.W.(2002).An Investigation Into Factors Associated With Low Achievement Of Students In Chemistry Subject In Busia At Kenya Certificate Of Secondary Education Level. Unpublished MEd Thesis. Kenyatta University. Kenya.
[20]
Elimu News. (2007). A Newsletter of the Ministry of Education. Issue No. 1.
[21]
Elliot, W.E. (2000). Prospects: the quarterly review of comparative education. Paris, Vol 30 no. 3, UNESCO.
[22]
Eisner, E.W. (2000). Benjamin Bloom 1913-99. A Paper by Prof. Elliot
[23]
W. Eisner UNESCO Bureau of Education. Enger, E. D and Ross, F. C. (2000). Concepts in Biology. Boston, USA, The McGraw-Hill Companies.
[24]
Farmer, M.H.(1993). Preparedness Assessment of First Year Physical Science Students in a Two – Year College. Journal of College Science Teaching. Pp. 346 – 350.
[25]
Fennema, E. (1976). Influences of Selected Cognitive, Affective and Educational Variables in Sex-related Differences in Mathematics. Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Madison, U.S.A, University of Wisconsin.
[26]
Gallenstein, N.L. (2004). Creative Discover Through Classification. Teaching Children Mathematics. Vol 11. pp.103-4.
[27]
Gatara, T. H. (2010). Introduction to Research Methodology. Nairobi, Kenya. The Olive Marketing and Publishing Company
[28]
Glennon, V.J. and Callahan, L. G. (1968). A Guide to Current Research: Elementary School Mathematics. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Washington D.C. U.S.A
[29]
Griffith, W. T., (1985) Factors Affecting Perfomance in Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, 53 (9), 839-842
[30]
Grote, M.(1995). Sure You Care, But Do Students Know It? The Physics Teacher, 33(Feb. 1995), pp 92-95
[31]
Grote, M (1994). Recruiting Students for High-School Physics Classes. The Physics Teacher, 32(September 1994), pp 350-351.
[32]
Hakim, T.(2007). High School Physics Enrolment Hits Record High. Science Daily. January 11th
[33]
Harding, J. (1986). Switched Off: The Science Education of Girls. York, U.K. Longman.
[34]
Hart, G. and Cottle, P.(1993) Academic Backgrounds and Achievement in College Physics. The Physics Teacher pp. 470 - 475
[35]
Hartlage, L.C. (1970). ‘Sex-linked inheritance of spatial ability’. Perceptual and Motor Skills, vol. 31, p. 610.
[36]
Holliday, W. (1975) “The effects of verbal and adjunct pictorial-verbal information in science instruction.” Journal of research in science teaching, 12 (8) pp 892-901
[37]
Hughes, A.G. and Hughes, E.H. (1959). Learning and Teaching. An Introduction to Psychology and Education. London, Longmans.
[38]
Hyde, J. (1981). ‘How large are cognitive gender differences?’American Psychologist. 36 (8) pp. 892-901
[39]
Kahn, S.B. and Weiss, J. (1973). The Teaching of Affective Responses in Travers, R.M.W. (ed) Second Hand Book of Research on Teaching. Chicago, USA. Rand McNally.
[40]
Juma, C. and Cheong, L. Y. (2005). UN Millennium Project. Task Force on Science, Technology, and Innovation. Innovation: applying knowledge in development. Achieving the Millennium Development Goals. London. Earthscan.
[41]
Kahle, J.B., and Meece, J. (1994) Research on gender issues in the classroom. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.
[42]
Kelly, A. (1985). ‘The construction of masculine science’.
[43]
British Journal of Sociology of Education, 6(2), 133-153.
[44]
Kenya Vision 2030. (2007) A Globally Competitive and Prosperous Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya. Government Printer.
[45]
KIE. Secondary Education Syllabus (2002). Mathematics, Chemistry, Physics, Biology and Agriculture. Volume Two. Nairobi, Kenya. Kenya Literature Bureau.
[46]
KNEC. (2010). Report on Monitoring learner achievement for class 3 in numeracy and literacy. TEACHING FOCUS POSTER. Nairobi, Kenya. Kalzmat Security Print Ltd.
[47]
KNEC. (2006). The Year 2005 KCSE Examination Report Kenya National Examinations Council 2006. Nairobi. Printed by KNEC
[48]
KNEC. (2007). The year 2006 KCSE examination Report Kenya National Examinations Council. Nairobi, Kenya. Printed by KNEC
[49]
KNEC. (2011). Confidential Marking Regulations. Kenya National Examination Council. Nairobi, Kenya. Printed by KNEC
[50]
KNEC. (2010). KCSE Regulations and Syllabuses 2010- 2011. Kenya National Examination Council. Nairobi, Kenya. Printed by KNEC
[51]
Kneller, G.F. (1971). Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
[52]
Kozherrnikov, M., Motes, M., and Hergarty, M. (2007). Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Science, 31, pp519-579
[53]
Krathwhol, D. R. and Anderson L.W. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning Teaching and Assessing. A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Boston, USA, Allyne and Bacon.
[54]
Leslie, L. L., McClure, G. T. and Oaxaca, R. L. (1998) Women and minorities in science and engineering: A life sequence analysis. The journal of higher education, 69, (3), pp. 239-276
[55]
Lord, T.R. (1985). Enhancing the visuo-spatual aptitude of students.Journal of research in science teaching, 22(5), pp. 395-405.
[56]
Lyons, T. (2005). The Puzzle of Falling Enrolments in Physics and Chemistry Courses: Putting Some Pieces Together. Research in Science Education. DOI: 10, 1007/s11165-005-9008-z
[57]
Maccoby, E. and Jacklin, C. (1975). The Psychology of Sex Differences. London, Wiley.
[58]
Madera, S.N.(2001) Teaching and Learning High School Physics Through Analogies :A Case Study of Kenyan Classrooms. Unpublished Doctor of Education Thesis Department of curriculum, Teaching and Learning. Ontario Institute of studies and Education of the University of Toronto
[59]
McFie, J. (1973) Intellectual Imbalance: A Perceptual Hypothesis. British Journal of Socal Clinical Psychology, 12. pp 433-434.
[60]
Mayer, R.E. (2003). Learning and Instruction. Pearson Education. Inc. Upper Saddle River pp. 287-88
[61]
MOE. (2007). A Newsletter of the Ministry of Education. Elimu News. Issue No. 1. Nairobi, Kenya.
[62]
MOEST. (2001). Science Module. Teaching and Learning Science in the Primary Classroom. SPRED. School based Teacher Development (SbTD). Nairobi, Kenya.
[63]
Nueschatz, M. and Covalt, M. (1988). Physics in the High Schools. American Institute of Physics. New York, U.S.A.
[64]
Ong, W., (1981) Fighting for life. Ithaca, U.S.A. Cornell University Press
[65]
O’Brien, S.B. (2002).Where the girls aren’t: High school girls and advanced placement physics enrolment. Dissertation and Theses Paper AAI3043392. Boston College, U.S.A.
[66]
Padilla, M.J. (1990). ‘Research Matters - to the Science Teacher’. No. 9004 University of Georgia, Athens, GA
[67]
Pallrand, G. J. and Seeber, F. (1984), ‘Spatial ability and achievement in introductory physics’. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 21: issue 5 pp. 507–516.
[68]
Palvio, A. (1970) On the further significance of image “Phsychological bulletin” 73 (3) 385-392.
[69]
Peltzer, A. (1988). The intellectual factors believed by physicists to be most important to physics students.” Journal of research in science teaching, 25(9) pp 721-731
[70]
Ramsey, G .A. and Howe, R.W. (1969 a). An analysis of Research on Instructional Procedures in Secondary School Science, Part I- Outcomes of Instruction. Science Teacher. 36, 3, pp 62-81
[71]
Rezba, R. J. (1999).Teaching and Learning The Basic Science Skills: Video tape Series. Office of Elementary and Middle School Instructional Services, Virginia Department of Education, P.O. Box 2120, Richmond, VA 23218-2120. Call media office for copies of videotapes at 804-225-2980.
[72]
Robinson, M. (1991). Raise Your Enrolment. The Science Teacher, 58(Feb. 1991) pp 24-27.
[73]
Sells, L. W. (1973). High school mathematics as the critical fitter in the job market. Developing opportunities for minorities in Graduate Education, pp. 47-59. Proceedings of the Conference on Minority Graduate Education at the University of California, Berkeley, U.S.A.
[74]
Serbin, A.L. (1972). Sex Differences in the Pre school Classroom: Patterns of Social Reinforcement. Doctorial Dissertation. State University of New York. NY.
[75]
Shaw, R. (1995). Principles of teaching. An Independent Study Textbook. Texas, U.S.A. ICI University Press.
[76]
Siemankowski, F. and Macknight, F. (1971). Spatial Cognition: Success prognosticator in college science courses. Journal of college science teaching 59. Pp1-56
[77]
Shaycoft, M.F., Dailey, J.T., Orr, D.B., Neyman, C.A., Jr., Sherman, S.E. (1963). The identification Development and Utilization of Human Talents: Studies of Complete Age Group -15. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Project Talent Office.
[78]
Sherman, J. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors. American Educational Research Journal, Winter, vol. 14, no. 1, pp 51-71.
[79]
Sobolewski, S.J (1993). A latent variable path analysis model of secondary physics enrolment in New York State. A presentation and discussion at the annual meeting of national association of research in science teaching. Atlanta. G.A. April 17.
[80]
Sorby, S.A. (2001). A course in spatial visualization and its impact on the retention of female engineering students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7, Pp153-172.
[81]
Stafford, R. E.(1961). Sex differences in spatial visualization as evidence of sex-linked inheritance. Perceptual and Motor Skills. Vol 13, p148.
[82]
Stanesby, D. M. (1985). Science, Reason and Religion. London and New York, Routledge, Croom Helm Ltd.
[83]
Suydam, M.N. and Riedesel, C.A. (1969) Interpretive Study of Research and Development in Elementary School Mathematics. Vol. 1. Introduction and Summary: What Research says, Final Report, Project no. 8- 0586. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
[84]
Tillery, W.B. (2007). Physics Customized Physical Science. Boston. U.S.A. Custom Publishing
[85]
Tsuma, O.G.K. (1998).Tsuma. Science Education in the African Context. Nairobi, Kenya. Jomo Kenyatta Foundation.
[86]
Twoli, N.W. (1986). Sex Differences in Science Achievement Among Secondary School Students in Kenya. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Flinders University. Australia.
[87]
VanGorden, T., and Slater, T.S., (1998). Factors Influencing Kansas High School Physics Enrolment. Kansas Science Teacher, 139(1), Pp 25-28.
[88]
Wanjama, L.N, Muraya P.N, and Gichaga S.N. (2006). Life Skills. A Handbook for Parents and Teachers. Nairobi, Kenya. The Jomo Kenyatta Foundation.
[89]
Wan, N. and Van, T.N. (2006). ‘International Education Journal’. 7(1), 36-50. Shannon Research Press.
[90]
Wiggins, G. (2009). On Excellence in Teaching. Bloomington, Indiana, U.S.A. Solution Tree Press.
[91]
Whyte, J. (1996). Girls into Science and Technology. London, U.K. Routledge.
[92]
Wittig, M.A. (1976). Sex differences in intellectual functioning: how much difference do genes make? Sex Roles. vol. 2, pp. 63-74.
[93]
Zhu, Z. (2007). Learning content, physics self – efficacy, and female students’ physics-taking. International Education Journal, 8(2), 204-212. Shannon Research Press. http://iej.com.au
Browse journals by subject