Volume 7, Issue 4, December 2019, Page: 116-121
Exploring the Effect of Peer Feedback and the Students’ Perceptions of the Feedback on Students’ Writing Skill
Rias Wita Suryani, Faculty of Languages and Art, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
Yenni Rozimela, Faculty of Languages and Art, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
Desvalini Anwar, Faculty of Languages and Art, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia
Received: Nov. 14, 2019;       Accepted: Dec. 9, 2019;       Published: Dec. 31, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20190704.14      View  338      Downloads  155
This study was aimed to investigate the effect of peer feedback on students’ writing skill and the students’ perceptions on the practice of peer feedback. The study adopted mixed methods research design. It involved 70 eleventh grade students in two intact classes at one public senior high school in West Sumatra, Indonesia. The students were given different types of treatment: the students from experimental class were given feedback from peers, and those from control class were given feedback from teacher. The study lasted 8 weeks. The data were collected through post-test and semi-structured interview. The post-test was used to obtain students’ writing scores and semi-structure interview to know their perception on the peer feedback. Findings of the study indicated that the students that were given peer feedback had better writing skill than those were given teacher feedback. This study also shows that the students had positive perceptions towards writing. They liked using this strategy because it made writing process become less stressful. However, there were also some students who valued teacher’s feedback more highly than the peer feedback. Those students believed that grammatical accuracy was more possible to be achieved through teacher feedback than through peer feedback because they thought that their peers had inadequate grammar knowledge.
Peer Feedback, Teacher Feedback, Students’ Writing Skill
To cite this article
Rias Wita Suryani, Yenni Rozimela, Desvalini Anwar, Exploring the Effect of Peer Feedback and the Students’ Perceptions of the Feedback on Students’ Writing Skill, International Journal of Secondary Education. Vol. 7, No. 4, 2019, pp. 116-121. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20190704.14
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principle and Interactive Approach to language pedagogy. New York: Longman Inc.
Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, pp. 191-205.
Ferris, D. R. (2005). Respond to students writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fallows, S., & Chandramohan, B. (2001). Multiple approaches to assessment: reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 6 (2), pp. 229-246.
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, pp. 185-212.
Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 81-104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goldstein, J. (2004). Making sense of distributed leadership: The case of peer assistance and review. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26 (2), pp. 173-197.
Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, pp. 79-200.
Hojeij, Z. & Hurley, Z. (2017). The triple flip: Using technology for peer and self-editing of writing. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11 (1), pp. 655-678.
Min, H.-T. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15 (2), pp. 118-141.
Tsui, A., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9 (2), pp. 147-170.
Liu, N. F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11 (3), pp. 279-290.
Rieber, L. J. (2006). Using peer review to improve student writing in business courses. Journal of Education for Business. 81 (6), pp. 322-326.
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18 (1), pp. 30-43.
Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving Assessment Through Student Involvement: Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning in Higher And Further Education. London: Routledge.
Lee, C & Shzk, N. (2010). Written peer feedback by EFL students. Komaba Journal of English Education.
Farrah, M. (2012). The Impact of Peer Feedback on Improving the Writing Skills among Hebron University Students. An - Najah Univ. J. Res. (Humanities). Vol. 26 (1) pp. 180-210.
Srichanyachon, N. (2011). A comparative study of three revision method in EFL Writing. Barcelona Academic European Conference: Thailand.
Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F. Onghena, P., & Smeets, S. (2010). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum. British Educational Research Journal, 36 (1), pp. 143–162.
Lu, R., & Bol, L. (2007). A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6 (2), pp. 100-115.
Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19: pp. 79-101.
Silver, R. & Lee, S. (2007). What does it take to make a change? Teacher feedback and student revisions. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, pp. 25-49.
Ravichandran, V. (2002). Responding to Student Writing: Motivate, Not Criticise. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies.
Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and students’ perceptions of Collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20 (4), 286-305.
Hansen, J. G. and Liu, J. (2005) Guiding Principles for Effective Peer Response. ELT Journal, 59, pp. 31-38.
Hu. (2005). Using peer feedback with Chinese ESL student writers. Language Teaching Research, 9 (2005), pp. 321-342.
Rollinson, P. (2005). Using Peer Feedback in the ESL Writing Class. ELT Journal, 59 (1): pp. 23-30.
Liu J. & Hansen, J. G. (2002). Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Riddle, D. (2003). Teaching English as a foreign/second language. London: Teach Yourself.
Riddiford, N. (2006). Collaborative error correction: How does it work? Prospect, 2 (13), 26-37.
Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1996). Chinese students’ perceptions of ESL Peer Response Group Interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5 (1), pp. 1-19.
Browse journals by subject